Planning Committee - Meeting Minutes
Monday 17th November 2025
Table Of Contents
Introduction
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON MONDAY 17 NOVEMBER 2025 AT 7.30PM IN THE LIONEL RIGBY ROOM AT THE VILLAGE CENTRE, ROGERS LANE, STOKE POGES, SL2 4LP.
Present: Cllr Crocker (Chair), Cllr Bassi, Cllr Finan, Mr Harris and Cllr Wilson.
In Attendance: Mrs J Simmonds (Clerk)
Agenda Items
078/PL/25 Items by Members of Public Present.
The meeting is open to the public and press, and the first 15 minutes will be reserved, if required, for public comment on items on this agenda only.
None
079/PL/25 Apologies for Absence and Acceptance.
APOLOGIES were received and accepted for Cllr Carter.
080/PL/25 Declarations of Interest
Members to declare any personal interest in any item of business as defined in the Code of Conduct 2007. If that interest is a prejudicial interest as defined in the Code, the member should withdraw from the meeting for that item.
None
081/PL/25 Minutes
RESOLVED to approve the Minutes of the Planning Meeting held on 20 October 2025, which were signed by the Chair.
082/PL/25 Planning Applications
(i) RESOLVED to approve delegated decisions submitted for Planning Applications for which the response date was prior to this Committee Meeting. See Appendix 1. It was agreed to append the comments to the minutes and for the clerk to give them on request, they are on the Planning Portal.
(ii) RESOLVED to consider and formulate a response to new Planning Applications received. See Appendix 2. Plus, amended plans for information only.
083/PL/25 NOTED Planning Decisions, Enforcements and Appeals.
District Decisions made since the last Planning Committee Meeting. See Appendix 3.
084/PL/25 Councillors/Members Update
085/PL/25 Buckinghamshire Council Complaints Procedure
Agree that the clerk will re-send out the link to the complaints procedure for councillors to read and bring back to next meeting.
086/PL/25 Correspondence.
NOTED PROPOSED UPGRADE TO EXISTING RADIO BASE STATION UPGRADE AT CS_13850640, LAND AT TEMPLEWOOD LANE, TEMPLEWOOD LANE FARNHAM COMMON, NR. GERRARDS CROSS, SLOUGH, SL2 4AN (NGR: E497400 N185420) – Comments required. No Comments.
NOTED Draft plans for a new data centre campus on land bordering M40 and A40 between Beaconsfield and Gerrards Cross. Teams meeting 20 November 2025, two representatives from each council invited. Cllr Crocker and Cllr Carter to attend if available.
087/PL/25 Exclusion of the Press & Public
Public Bodies (Admission to Meetings) Act 1960 RESOLVED to exclude the press and public from the following business because publicity would prejudice the public interest by reason of the confidential nature of the business. Part two items: To discuss any possible unlawful buildings or business’s which have not been granted enforcement notices and therefore are not public.
088/PL/25 NOTED Outstanding Enforcements See Appendix 4.
089/PL/25 NOTED Next meeting date: 8 December 2025
Meeting ended at 9.00pm
APPENDIX 1
DELEGATED COMMENTS
PL/25/4571/PIP Magnolia Farm, Grays Park Road, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire
Application for permission in principle for the erection of minimum of 7 and a maximum of 7 dwelling.
Parish Comments: On the planning portal or on request to the clerk.
PL/25/4588/PIP Magnolia Farm, Grays Park Road, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire
Application for permission in principle for the erection of minimum of 5 and a maximum of 5 dwelling.
Parish Comments: On the planning portal or on request to the clerk.
APPENDIX 2
NEW PLANNING APPLICATIONS RECEIVED
PL/25/3612/FA 41 Vine Road, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire, SL2 4DW
Detached outbuilding to be used as home office and gym (Part retrospective).
Parish Comments: We are extremely disappointed that we asked for an extension for comments however this has already been decided before we had the chance to comment, but we are happy it was refused.
PL/25/3678/VRC Site of Boundary Meadow, Collum Green Road, Stoke Poges, Bucks.
Variation of condition 7 (BNG Credits) of planning permission ref: PL/24/1337/FA (New main entrance access gate and fencing, revised access road layout, internal driveway and hard standing and siting of solar panels (part retrospective)) to allow for an amended BNG metric.
Parish Comments: We are leaving this to the case office to follow through and ensure the conditions are met.
PL/25/4289/TP The Forge, Park Road, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire, SL2 4PG
T1 Lime - Fell due to two Ganoderma Bracket, one old one at the front of the tree and a large one at the rear.
Parish Comments: No objection subject to the tree officer report.
PL/25/3900/FA 28 Sefton Close, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire, SL2 4LJ
Proposed single storey front extension and pitched roof over existing bay window.
Parish Comments: No Comment.
PL/25/4920/KA Stoke Park Golf Club, Park Road, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire, SL2 4PG
Tree 1 - Oak - Remove (Stoke Park Conservation Area)
Parish Comments: We note that this application has been withdrawn.
PL/25/4442/FA Stoke Park Golf Club, Park Road, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire, SL2 4PG
Installation of 2 polytunnels and administration marquee for a period of three years (part retrospective).
Parish Comments: Object, there are never ending temporary works applications for this site which are applied for retrospectively and there is not enough information given on the requests. Why is there not a sitewide masterplan for this address?
We know this information/guidance of polytunnels in the Green Belt which we believe should be followed:
Polytunnels are generally allowed in the Green Belt for agricultural and horticultural purposes as they are often not considered inappropriate development. However, they still require planning permission if they are large, commercial, or have a more permanent structure, and must be assessed against Green Belt policy, especially concerning their impact on visual amenities and openness.
Key considerations
- Agricultural and horticultural use: Polytunnels for growing crops are generally accepted as a form of agricultural development.
- Impact on Green Belt: Even if agricultural, the polytunnel must still comply with Green Belt policy. It cannot negatively impact the visual amenities or openness of the Green Belt.
- Structure and permanence: Polytunnels with more permanent structures, such as solid bases, can be more contentious and may be treated differently than temporary structures.
- Scale and use: Large commercial polytunnels, or those used for more than simple horticulture, are more likely to require specific planning permission.
- Local restrictions: Special rules may apply in areas like National Parks, Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, or where there are listed buildings or ancient woodlands nearby.
We also know this guidance for Marquees in the Green Belt; this guidance should be adhered to: marquees in the Green Belt which would need to demonstrate very special circumstances to be allowed:
Marquees are generally not allowed in the Green Belt without a formal planning application or specific permission because of its protected status. Building in the Green Belt is restricted, and temporary structures are only allowed under strict conditions, such as for pubs and restaurants under specific permitted development rights for temporary use (no more than 28 days for private use), but these don't apply to public Green Belt land.
Key considerations
- Protected status: The Green Belt is a protected area, and any development is restricted to protect openness and prevent urban sprawl.
- Permission: You will almost certainly need approval from the local council to put up a marquee on Green Belt land, even for short-term or private use.
- Public use: Using a marquee for commercial or public-facing activities (like a wedding venue or festival) is considered a change of land use and will likely require planning permission.
- Temporary structures: Even with the general allowance for temporary structures for pubs and restaurants (under 28 days), this rule doesn't typically apply to public land in the Green Belt.
- Special circumstances: There are rare cases where a temporary marquee might be allowed in the Green Belt if it can be argued that it serves "very special circumstances," but this is a high bar to meet.
- Landowner permission: You must get permission from the landowner, even if you are on private property.
PL/25/4481/HB Stoke Park House, Park Road, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire
Listed Building Consent for opening up works to determine extent of rot and damage to the historic fabric of Stoke Park Mansion, to include removal of damaged and non performing areas of slate roof, flashings, batting, sarking boards, upstands, existing timber roof structures, the removal of defective flashings around chimney stacks, parapet details, examination of cornices and stonework, removal of bossed render, removal of rotten timber window frames, remove all elements of non-functioning DPMs and waterproofing, internally lifting of floorboards for review of floor structure, and removal of elements of internal plasterwork and ceilings where dampness has occurred.
Parish Comments: No Comment.
PL/25/4482/HB Stoke Park House, Park Road, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire
Listed Building Consent for repairs to exterior of Stoke Park Mansion including roof structures, rainwater, balustrade, upstand repairs and facade repairs including cornices, render, stone detailing, lintels, windows, doors, brickwork structures in order to provide weather protection and structural repairs to maintain the longevity of Stoke Park Mansion.
Parish Comments: No Comment.
PL/25/4081/FA 1 Mobbs Close, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire, SL2 4FF
Single storey side extension with internal alterations.
Parish Comments: No comment subject to the tree officer report.
AMENDED PLANS
PLANS FOR INFORMATION ONLY
TREE PRESERVATION ORDER
APPENDIX 3
PLANNING DECISIONS
PL/25/3140/VRC MH House, Lakeside Drive, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire, SL2 4LX
Variation of condition 2 (Materials), 4 (landscaping) & 14 (Drawings) attached to PL/24/1145/VRC (Variations of conditions 2 (Materials), 3 (Hard surface materials) and 14 (Approved plans) of planning permission PL/23/1510/FA (Demolition of existing property to be replaced with two new dwellings, with provisions of bin/cycle storage and parking.) to allow for changes to materials and windows.) To allow for the construction detached garages at the front of plots 1 & 2 and internal alterations and single storey extension to plot 2.
Parish Comments: Object. We refer you to the design codes within our Neighbourhood Plan which has now been adopted. LB01, LB03 & LB04 all apply.
Policies H9 and EP3 also apply.
The proposed detached double garage, by virtue of its height scale and siting, would appear unduly prominent and detrimental to the character and appearance of the street scene and the locality in general, and would therefore be contrary to Policies EP3 and H13 of the SBDC Local Plan (adopted March 1999).
By virtue of its proposed scale, design and siting within the plot, the proposed detached garage building would appear as a prominent and obtrusive feature within the street scene. Given its overall height and footprint, the building would not be considered to appear very subordinate when viewed in the context of the dwelling on site and would rather appear as a competing feature not compatible with the character and amenities of the site itself, adjoining developments and the locality in general. The proposed development would result in the imposition of an alien feature such as that proposed within the local vernacular would cause further harm to the character and appearance of the street scene. As such, the proposal would be contrary to policies EP3 and H13 of the South Bucks District Local Plan (adopted March 1999, Consolidated September 2007 and February 2011), policy CP8 of the South Bucks Core Strategy (adopted February 2011), the NPPF and the National Design Guide.
The Local Plan Page 210, Appendix 8 No 4 Front Extensions, no 9 and No 9.3 also apply.
WITHDRAWN
PL/25/3541/PAPCR Sefton Park, Bells Hill, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire
Prior approval for the change of use from Commercial, Business and Service use (Class E) to residential use (Class C3) (Schedule 2, Part 3, Class MA)
Prior Notification under Class MA of Part 3, Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 for change of use from commercial, business and service (Use Class E) to 14 residential flats (Use Class C3)
Parish Comments: There are concerns around public transport and its lack of infrastructure within the locality. The only public transport is an infrequent bus service.
Even though there is a network of paths and cycle routes, they are not all accessible or usable at this point. The Parish Council have undertaken a survey of all footpaths recently for its Neighbourhood Plan, many of the paths are impassable, gates or styles are also broken, none are suitable for a push chair/ buggy or wheelchair users. As this development progresses and increases our population the Parish Council would like to request a Section 106 to contribute towards a project to address these problems and make them accessible to bicycles and buggies etc. We believe our Neighbourhood Plan sets this out as below:
Stoke Poges Neighbourhood Plan (2020–2042)
2.3.8 The Neighbourhood Plan Objectives are as follows:
• Connected Buckinghamshire – provide efficient and reliable transport network
• Growing Buckinghamshire – secure good road, public transport, cycle and walking infrastructure and service provision to meet the needs of residents
• Healthy, Safe and Sustainable Buckinghamshire – promoting sustainable transport choices and access to opportunities
• Empowered Buckinghamshire – allow everyone to access the educational, work and social opportunities they need
2.3.9 The Plan states that public transport and other sustainable transport methods such as walking and cycling should be encouraged as much as possible to ensure settlement areas are well-integrated and connected.
Prior Approval is given.
PL/25/3822/KA Stoke Park Golf Club, Park Road, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire, SL2 4PG
Works to trees in accordance with a submitted schedule. (Stoke Park Conservation Area).
Parish Comments: No Comment subject to the tree officers report
No TPO Required, works can commence.
PL/25/1803/FA 10 Sefton Close, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire, SL2 4LJ
Part single, part two storey rear extension and side extension, extension of front porch.
Parish Comments: Object Overdevelopment of site. Appendix 8 of the Local Plan section (3), 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 and 7.4 apply.
The proposed development, by virtue of a combination of its size, scale, massing, style and proximity to the sites flank boundaries, would appear over dominant, obtrusive and out of keeping, as well as appearing as a cramped overdevelopment of the site. As such, it would have an adverse impact on the street scene and the character and visual amenities of the area. Therefore, the proposal is contrary to policies H9 and EP3 of the South Bucks District Local Plan (adopted March 1999), and policy CP8 of the South Bucks Core Strategy (adopted February 2011), and the NPPF. Furthermore, the proposed development would not reflect the form or height of existing buildings on this designated Formal Suburban Road, to the detriment of its appearance and character and contrary to the content of the South Bucks Townscape Character Study.
We refer you to our newly adopted neighbourhood plan which can be viewed on our website but should be being used by Planning Officers for every application. Sections LB04 applies.
Hereby Refuses Permission
PL/25/3248/FA Gayfere, Hollybush Hill, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire, SL2 4PW
Proposed single storey rear extension and fenestration alterations.
Parish Comments: No Comment
Hereby Refuses Permission.
PL/24/3387/FA 17 Sefton Paddock, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire, SL2 4PT
Demolition of existing detached dwelling and erection of a pair of semi-detached dwellings including on-site parking, utilising existing vehicular crossover.
Parish Comments: - Object, our previous comments on the last application number PL/23/3772/FA still apply and were:
Parish Comments: - Object. The proposed development, by virtue of a combination of its size, scale, massing, style and proximity to the sites flank boundaries, would appear over dominant, obtrusive and out of keeping, as well as appearing as a cramped overdevelopment of the site. As such, it would have an adverse impact on the street scene and the character and visual amenities of the area. Therefore, the proposal is contrary to policies H9 and EP3 of the South Bucks District Local Plan (adopted March 1999), and policy CP8 of the South Bucks Core Strategy (adopted February 2011), and the NPPF. Furthermore, the proposed development would not reflect the form or height of existing buildings on this designated Formal Suburban Road, to the detriment of its appearance and character and contrary to the content of the South Bucks Townscape Character Study.
This proposal, if permitted would be likely to act as a precursor of further applications for similar types of development, which the Planning Authority would find increasingly difficult to resist.
We would like to draw your attention to the Stoke Poges Design and Guidance Codes of the Neighbourhood Plan September 2023 page 67, LB01, 1, 2, 3, & 4. Page 70, LB03. This has now been completed via regulation 14.
4. Decision-making
48. Local planning authorities may give weight to relevant policies in emerging plans according to:
(a) the stage of preparation of the emerging plan (the more advanced its preparation, the greater the weight that may be given).
(b) the extent to which there are unresolved objections to relevant policies (the less significant the unresolved objections, the greater the weight that may be given); and
(c) the degree of consistency of the relevant policies in the emerging plan to this Framework (the closer the policies in the emerging plan to the policies in the Framework, the greater the weight that may be given).
The Ecology and Trees checklist states that they are not within 200 meters of a pre-1960 or pre 1914 building or woodland which is not true.
Also, point number 1 on the officer’s refusal for the original application still apply to this application and were:
The proposed development by reason of its poor architectural design, rationale and layout would result in a visually discordant development which would fail to provide a high-quality design that would appear appropriate within the character and scale of the surrounding area. The proposal would therefore constitute a poor form of development which fails to take the opportunity to contribute positively to making places better for people and would be detrimental to the character and appearance of the site and immediate and wider area.
Hereby Permits
PL/24/3921/VRC Home Farm Barn, School Lane, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire, SL2 4QA
Variation of condition 4 of planning permission PL/23/3693/FA (Part retrospective extension of residential garden; and accompanying soft landscaping; erection of 1.8m high timber fence; alterations to existing boundary treatment to provide timber gate with brick posts; formation of hardstanding to form 'in and out' driveway.) to extend time frames by an additional 3 months for compliance and condition approval of submitted landscaping plan.
Parish Comments: Object, we feel that this has been under Enforcement for over two years and that this is not acceptable, no special or valid reasons or circumstances have been given to allow an extension of time especially in this sensitive Green Belt area.
Hereby Permits
PL/25/2803/TP 14 Elizabeth Way, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire, SL2 4LQ
Raise crown to approx. 5m by removing lower hanging pendulous growth only, over resident garden side only to 1 x Oak tree.
Parish Comments: No Comment subject to the tree officers report.
Hereby Grants Consent
PL/25/3665/TP Firs Lodge, Gerrards Cross Road, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire, SL2 4ET
T1 Lime - Re pollard Lime tree back to previous points with a view to reducing leaf fall over Autumn. Re set pollard points to 2m lower to maintain canopy size., T2 Cedar - Crown reduce by 2m to maintain canopy spread and reduce weight on limbs as winter approaches with a view to preventing splitting limbs.
Parish Comments: No comment subject to the tree officers report.
Hereby Refuses Consent